1. That it wasn’t just 4,500 people that died on 911. People are still dying. Dogs have died from the asbestos. People that haven’t died have cancer. The death rate from 911 continues to go up.
2. That Silverstein got 7 billion for The Towers. People are still dying. 3. Just 3 months before the “terroists” attacks Silverstein took out Terrost Insurance on The Towers.
4. There was no insurance investigation pertaining to Silverstein. If We took out insurance on anything and 3 months later someone died you bet your bottom dollar there’d be an investigation to make sure everything was legit.
5. That Silverstein was NOT the owner of the buildings, yet he got the insurance. Shouldn’t the Owners of the building got it?
6. That there are antimissle weapons that protect the White House as well as the Pentagon. That anything that would threaten those buildings would have been shot out of the sky.
6. That just because someone actus like that are Christian doesn’t mean they are.
7. Iraq wasn’t part of 911.
8. There was never any “Weapons of Mass Destruction” found. If there were, they would have peraded them on CNN, MSNBC, and other news channels.
9. That Halliburton get no big deals behind closed doors.
10. Rumsfed is the CEO of Halliburton.
11. There is no actual law called “Excutive Privledge”. And if there is, Why isn’t there one for Supervisor Privledge, or Manager Privledge or Soldier Privledge, or even Citizen Privledge?
12. That the “Terrorists” took over with nothing more than box cutters, yet our Government and FBI have a plethera of weapons at their disposal.
How many know?
07
Jun
Fnordian
June 7, 2010 at 11:56 am
1. I don’t know the exact numbers, but yes, it was 4500 (or so) that died ON 9/11. People are still dying now, but this is AFTER 9/11.
2. Since this is just a basic fact, I’m not going to comment on it but I will assume it is valid.
3. (does not exist for some reason)
4. What’s to investigate? Towers were destroyed. Policy paid if towers were destroyed. Barring the actual policy description itself, there’s no way for us to know what clauses were included- but I can say with confidence that if clauses were included that could have let the insurance company out of the payment, they would have done a THOROUGH investigation. If you were about to pay 7 billion, wouldn’t you?!?
5. Irrelevant. The owners of the buildings don’t necessarily get anything. The beneficiary of the policy gets the benefit.
6. I don’t know anything about this so I’m not going to comment on it…
Harley
June 7, 2010 at 12:41 pm
Yes, that is all available information. A lot of it is opinion and conspiracy material.
johnfarber2000
June 7, 2010 at 1:18 pm
There is enough here to merit a serious completely independent investigation.